FinCEN Customer Due Diligence 2016

Last updated: July 15, 2025

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Rule, implemented in 2016 and effective from May 11, 2018, marked a significant enhancement in the United States' anti-money laundering (AML) efforts. This rule clarified and strengthened customer due diligence requirements for covered financial institutions, including banks, brokers or dealers in securities, mutual funds, and futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities1.

The CDD Rule introduced four core elements:

  1. Customer Identification and Verification: Covered institutions must identify and verify the identity of customers, a requirement already in place under existing Customer Identification Program (CIP) rules2.

  2. Beneficial Ownership Identification and Verification: Financial institutions are required to identify and verify the beneficial owners of legal entity customers. This includes identifying any individual who owns 25% or more of a legal entity, and one individual who controls the legal entity3.

  3. Understanding the Nature and Purpose of Customer Relationships: Institutions must understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships to develop customer risk profiles2.

  4. Ongoing Monitoring: The rule mandates continuous monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer information2.

The beneficial ownership requirement was particularly significant, as it addressed a critical gap in the U.S. AML framework. By requiring financial institutions to look beyond the legal entity to the natural persons who ultimately own or control it, the rule aimed to prevent the misuse of legal entities for illicit purposes, including money laundering and terrorist financing3.

Implementation of the CDD Rule required financial institutions to update their AML compliance programs, including modifying customer onboarding processes, updating risk assessment methodologies, and enhancing ongoing monitoring procedures. The rule also necessitated additional staff training and system upgrades to ensure compliance2.

While the CDD Rule strengthened the AML regime, it also posed challenges for financial institutions, particularly in terms of increased compliance costs and operational complexities. However, it has been widely recognized as a crucial step in improving transparency in the U.S. financial system and aligning U.S. practices with international AML standards13.

The FinCEN CDD Rule of 2016 represents a pivotal development in the evolution of U.S. AML legislation, building upon earlier laws like the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT Act, and setting the stage for further enhancements such as those introduced by the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020.

  1. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Money-Laundering-Control-Act

  2. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-105000-money-laundering

  3. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/money-laundering-11

  4. https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5077

  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_Laundering_Control_Act

  6. https://alessa.com/blog/money-laundering-control-act/

  7. https://www.fincen.gov/history-anti-money-laundering-laws

  8. https://complianceconcourse.willkie.com/resources/anti-money-laundering-us-money-laundering-control-act/